Assessing MHC-B diversity in Silkie chickens (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Poult Sci
  • v.99(5); 2020 May
  • PMC7597446

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Assessing MHC-B diversity in Silkie chickens (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Katy J. Tarrant,∗,1 Rodrigo Lopez, Meghan Loper, and Janet E. Fulton

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is a highly polymorphic region on chromosome 16, which contains numerous immune response genes, and is known to influence disease susceptibility and resistance in chickens. Variability of MHC-B haplotypes in various well-known and commercially utilized breeds has previously been identified. This study aims to understand MHC-B diversity in the Silkie breed using a high-density SNP panel that encompasses the chicken MHC-B region. DNA was obtained from 74 females and 27 males from a commercial Silkie breeder colony that is maintained through minimal genetic selection practices. A previously described panel of 90 SNPs, all located within the MHC-B region, was used to evaluate MHC-B variability in the commercial Silkie breeder colony. MHC-B haplotypes identified from the individual SNP information in the Silkie colony were compared to published haplotypes from the same region. Of the 27 haplotypes identified in the Silkie population, 8 have been previously described. Nineteen haplotypes are unique to the Silkie population and include one novel recombinant and 2 additional possible novel recombinants. Six haplotypes were found at a frequency greater than 5% of the population, of which 4 are novel. Finally, Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was calculated for the observed haplotypes, which were found to be in HWE. This study shows considerable MHC-B diversity in the Silkie breed and adds further information on variability of the MHC-B region in the chicken.

Key words: Silkie, MHC-B, haplotype, SNP

Introduction

Silkies are an archaic and unique breed. Early accounts of chickens with “cat fur” were reported in China in the 12th century (Haw, 2006). Silkies were recognized as the first United States Poultry Standard of Perfection published in 1874 (Haw, 2006, Ekarius, 2007, Hu etal., 2010). The breed is distinguished by fine silken feathers resembling hair, with feathering down the legs, rose comb, and polydactyly (Hutt, 1949, American Poultry Association, 2001, Haw, 2006). The breed standard accepts feather coloration of white, black, buff, blue, gray, and partridge. The breed is historically significant as it has been, and currently is, highly valued for its medicinal qualities in Asian communities (Bliss, 2011, Higginbottom etal., 2018).

The most striking physical feature of the Silkie breed is the internal and external melanin pigmentation present throughout the body. Bateson and Punnett (1911) initially hypothesized that the coloration was a result of a pigmentation and an inhibition factor. Dorshorst etal. (2010) mapped the skin pigment associations to 2 main genes, an inhibitor of dermal melanin (Id) on chromosome Z and fibromelanosis (Fm) on chromosome 20, using a genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism trait association. SNP regions associated with other traits observable in Silkies were identified, including polydactyly on chromosome 2, hook-less feathers on chromosome 3, and feathering of the legs on chromosome 13 (Dorshorst etal., 2010). The Silkie chicken has served as a scientific model organism for identifying neural crest cell migratory pathways and proliferation throughout embryogenesis due to the melanism coloration (Lecoin etal., 1994, Reedy etal., 1998, Faraco etal., 2001). From a production standpoint, Silkies represent a minor portion of the meat bird industry in the United States; however, production of the breed has remained consistent due to specialized markets in ethnic areas, such as Los Angeles and San Francisco (Loper, unpublished).

The chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC) comprises 2 independently assorting regions, the MHC-B and MHC-Y regions, both of which are found on chromosome 16 (Briles etal., 1993, Miller etal., 1996). The recent review of Miller and Taylor (2016) summarizes the current knowledge of these 2 genomic regions. The MHC genotype information presented herein encompasses the MHC-B region only.

The highly polymorphic MHC-B region contains multiple genes associated with chicken immune function. Numerous studies have shown strong associations between variation within the chicken MHC-B and disease resistance. Research has been done evaluating associations with the MHC-B to response to viral diseases such as Marek's disease (Goto etal., 2009), Rous sarcoma virus (Taylor, 2004), and Newcastle disease virus (Norup etal., 2011). The chicken MHC-B region is also known to influence the outcome of numerous bacterial diseases including those induced by Staphylococcus aureus (Cotter etal., 1992), Escherichia coli (Macklin etal., 2002, Macklin etal., 2009, Cavero etal., 2009), and Salmonella enteritidis (Schou etal., 2010). Association of MHC-B haplotypes with resistance to internal and external parasites has also been found (Lillehoj etal., 1988, Owen etal., 2008, Schou etal., 2010). Furthermore, the chicken MHC-B has been shown to be associated with economically relevant traits in production systems including body weight, mortality, egg production, and hatchability (Bacon, 1987, Abplanalp etal., 1992, Sander, 1993).

It has been suggested that it is the heterozygous nature of this highly polymorphic region that has the greatest impact on overall disease resistance (Sato etal., 1992). Ngeno etal., (2015) indicated that a high level of genetic diversity in the MHC-B region of indigenous chicken populations in Kenya is reflective of the hardy nature of the chickens. Izadi etal., (2011) showed that 4 noncommercial flocks (Taiwanese Cross, Yellow Wai-Chau, Shiqi, and Yellow Shiqi) contain more variability at the LEI0258 microsatellite marker within the MHC region, when compared to 2 intensively selected commercial flocks. The authors hypothesized that the high MHC variability in these pasture, or free range–raised, noncommercial flocks would likely translate to more effective disease resistance, as these populations were developed under stressful environments (parasite/disease exposure). Alternatively, reports have indicated hom*ozygotes or heterozygotes could demonstrate advantageous performance in certain haplotype combinations in hybrid progeny (Dunnington etal., 1992). Examination of MHC-B variability in a wild sampled Red Jungle Fowl population revealed extensive heterozygosity (Nguyen-Phuc etal., 2016). Ultimately, variability of the region itself, in addition to specific gene variations, may lead to enhanced immune functionality of an individual.

The sequence of a 243,833bp reference region in the chicken MHC-B provides the opportunity to standardize haplotype identification based on DNA variation (Shiina etal., 2007). A SNP panel that encompasses most of the MHC-B region, developed by Chazara et al. (2010), was subsequently modified to cover 230,000bp with 101 SNP (Fulton etal., 2016b). Some of these SNPs are within a region that includes gene duplication and deletion, and thus, accurate genotyping for those particular SNP can be difficult. The genotypes presented herein encompass the MHC-B region from SNP MHC-J06 to MHC-178 as defined by Fulton etal. (2016b) and covers 210,000bp. The SNP panel was initially validated using DNA of known serologically defined MHC haplotypes from multiple research lines, as well as standard breeds, heritage breeds, and elite commercial egg production lines from multiple sources. Subsequently, additional haplotypes have been identified in Finnish Landrace populations (Fulton etal., 2017) and an Argentinian Campero population (Iglesias etal., 2019).

Owing to the economic value and cultural significance of the Silkie breed, evaluation of genetic variation is warranted. The association of the MHC-B region of the chicken with disease resistance suggests that understanding the genetic variation within Silkies has relevance to disease resistance and potential improved value of the breed. Furthermore, additional information on haplotype variation existing within different breeds provides insight of variation within this important region of the chicken genome.

Methods

Study Population

One hundred one individuals were randomly selected from a closed Silkie colony (74 females and 27 males). The 5,000-head commercial breeding colony is white feathered and is used for producing offspring for specialty poultry meat markets. The colony is maintained through minimal genetic selection practices. The only parameter used is selection against red-colored combs, as black combs are preferred in the consumer meat market. A comb color other than black, or dark mulberry, is not ideal according to the breed standard, and a red comb is considered a disqualification (American Poultry Association, 2001). This work was completed under the approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee application on the Fresno State campus (#167).

Blood Collection and Genotyping

10μL of blood was transferred onto a Whatman FTA Elute card (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ) and allowed to dry overnight. The DNA extraction procedure followed the manufacturer's instructions. Genotyping was completed on the 90 SNP panel (MHC-J6 to MHC-178) using KASP (LGC Biosearch Technologies, Middlesex, UK) genotyping procedures (subset of the 101 SNP panel) described in Fulton etal. (2016b). Briefly, the KASP technology uses PCR-based single SNP assays with allele-specific competitive amplification, and fluorescence-based end-point reads (Semagn etal., 2013). Any PCR-based technology will work for detection of the alleles, if the primer sequences are known. Details, including the specific primers for each assay, are given in the study by Fulton etal., 2016b. Genotypes were determined using Kraken software (LGC Biosearch Technologies, Middlesex, UK).

Defining and Naming Haplotypes

Haplotypes were identified following a two-step process as described in the study by Fulton etal. (2017). hom*ozygous individuals for all SNPs were identified and used to establish an initial set of haplotypes. Heterozygous individuals were then compared with these initial haplotypes and used to identify additional alternative haplotypes present in the population within heterozygote individuals. Finally, each haplotype found was compared to common haplotypes reported in previous studies using the same SNP panel (Fulton etal., 2016a, Fulton etal., 2016b, Fulton etal., 2017, Iglesias etal., 2019) to determine if the haplotypes had been previously reported or were novel.

Segregation of haplotypes identified in the Silkie population was evaluated for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) by calculating the frequency of the parental haplotypes. Calculated expected counts were compared with observed frequency through a chi-square test. All rare haplotypes (frequencies less than 5%) were grouped together for this analysis.

Results and discussion

A total of 27 haplotypes were identified in the Silkie population under study, and the genotypes obtained for each SNP are given in Figure1. Comparison of these haplotypes with those previously identified within standard breeds, heritage breeds, and commercial egg production breeds (Fulton etal., 2016a) showed that 8 of these haplotypes (43%) had been previously identified. Comparison with the information from the original source of these 8 haplotypes indicates that 7 were previously found in the Rhode Island Red (RIR), White Plymouth Rock (WPR), Barred Plymouth Rock (BPR), and/or New Hampshire (NH) breeds. This suggests that there may have been some historic introgression of these specific breeds in to the Silkie breed, perhaps to improve meat production. This hypothesis would need to be tested with a more thorough examination of genomic diversity outside of the small segment of chromosome 16 that contains the MHC-B region that was the focus of this study.

Open in a separate window

Figure1

Existing and novel haplotypes identified in the Silkie population. Recombinant and possible recombinants are also listed.

The SNP composition of the remaining 19 novel haplotypes is also provided in Figure1. Comparison of these 19 novel Silkie haplotypes with novel haplotypes reported in the Finnish Landrace (Fulton etal., 2017) and Argentinian Campero (Iglesisa etal., 2019) showed no shared haplotypes, and thus, these are unique to the Silkie population evaluated in this study. Alignment of BSNP-SLK-Hap13 with the other haplotypes found within the Silkie population shows identical SNP genotypes with BSNP-O03 for the first 64 SNPs, followed by identical SNP genotypes with BSNP-SLK-Hap01 for the last 27 SNPs. This commonality suggests that the novel Silkie haplotype BSNP-SLK-Hap13 may be recombinant between the BSNP-O03 haplotype (from SNP MHC-J6 to MHC-118) and the BSNP-SLK-Hap01 (from MHC-118 to MHC-178), with the recombination event having occurred between SNP-MHC116 (149,999bp) and MHC-119 (157,474bp). Recombination events in this same region have been previously reported (Fulton etal., 2016b).

Two additional potential recombinants were also found. BSNP-SLK-Hap02 and BSNP-SLK-Hap03 each can be explained by potential recombination events between other haplotypes present in the Silkie population. For both of these novel Silkie haplotypes, there is a large swath of the MHC-B region identical with other haplotypes, making it difficult to define a recombination region. Possible parental MHC-B haplotypes for each of these potential recombinants are given in Figure1. It is also possible that the actual parental haplotypes are not represented in this particular population sampling. All of these recombinants are merely proposed based on the limited information available. Confirmation or refuting of these proposed parental haplotypes could happen if additional MHC-B SNP typing was done for the entire colony. It is also possible that the original parental haplotypes for these novel recombinants no longer exist in the population.

The number of BSNP haplotypes identified within this sampling of 102 birds is considerably higher than that found for other randomly mated population breeds with similar sample sizes. The pure breeds studied by Fulton etal. (2016a) had only 1 to 4 BSNP haplotypes per breed, which was likely a consequence of a historic genetic bottleneck for those pure breeds. By contrast, the heritage broiler populations, which were each initially formed from multiple line crosses, had 5-11 BSNP haplotypes per population. This is much less than the 27 haplotypes found in the Silkie population. Two of the haplotypes from the heritage broiler populations, BSNP-C05 and BSNP-T04, were also found in the Silkie breed. The Argentina Campero chicken synthetic breed was developed by crossing multiple established breeds and was found to contain 11 BSNP haplotypes, sharing BSNP-A08 and BSNP-M01 (both initially found in RIR and WPR breeds) with the Silkie population (Iglesias etal., 2019).

Seven of the haplotypes found within the Silkie population are shared with the New Hampshire, Rhode Island Red, and White Leghorn breeds. These breeds also share the most frequent haplotypes found in 13 Finish Landrace populations evaluated by Fulton etal. (2017). It was speculated that the similarity in haplotypes among the NH, RIR, WL, and Finish populations may be due to similar breeding histories between Finnish Landrace and highly selected production breeds (Fulton etal., 2017). Interestingly, seven of the 13 Finnish Landrace populations evaluated using the SNP panel described in Fulton etal. (2016b) share haplotypes with the Silkie population.

When considering the haplotype counts from the 101 Silkie individuals evaluated, 6 haplotypes were found at greater than 5% frequency. Two of these are established haplotypes, and 4 are novel. The most frequent haplotype found in the Silkie population is the BSNP-O03 haplotype (20.3%), which was previously found in 4 breeds (BRL, NH, RIR, and WL). The BSNP-O02 haplotype was at a frequency of 15.8% and was previously seen in 2 other breeds (NH, RIR). The third most prevalent haplotype is the novel SLK-Hap02 at 14.4%. Both novel and established haplotypes in the population were found at low frequencies (<5%). The remaining 21 haplotypes were found at less than 3% in the population, and in many cases, only one individual was identified with that haplotype. More haplotypes were identified within the Silkie population than have been previously reported in individual populations (Fulton etal., 2016a, Fulton etal., 2017, Iglesias etal., 2019), with the exception of the considerably diverse MHC region in wild caught jungle fowl (Nguyen-Phuc etal., 2016).

It is worth noting that the shared haplotypes were previously reported in breeds common to North America used for egg production, meat, or dual purpose. The haplotypes within the population were determined to be in HWE, as was expected in this closed population of random mated individuals (P>0.05).

Commercial Silkie production represents a culturally significant minor poultry production industry in the United States (Chen and Weijian, 1998, Li etal., 2004, Higginbottom etal., 2018). Understanding genetic diversity within the commercial population, especially as it relates to the immune-important MHC region, is warranted. Interestingly, the Silkie population evaluated has shown to be highly variable within the MHC-B region, compared to other populations evaluated. It is likely that this genetic diversity beneficially impacts the immune function of this population. Finally, information from this Silkie population adds to the growing collection of MHC data using the SNP panel. The information described here is best understood within the context of other data gathered using this SNP panel, which aims to realize, and quantify, the variation of the polymorphic MHC in the chicken.

Acknowledgments

The authors are appreciative of Pitman Family Farms for providing access to samples for this study and to Ashlee Lund and the Hy-Line International Molecular Genetics Lab for providing the genotyping.

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • Abplanalp H., Sato K., Napolitano D., Reid J. Reproductive-performance of inbred congenic leghorns carrying different haplotypes for the major histocompatibility complex. Poult. Sci. 1992;71:9–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • American Poultry Association . American Poultry Association, Inc.; Mendon, MA: 2001. The American Standard of Perfection. [Google Scholar]
  • Bacon L.D. Influence of the major histocompatibility complex on disease resistance and productivity. Poult. Sci. 1987;66:802–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bateson W., Punnett R.C. The inheritance of the peculiar pigmentation of the Silky fowl. J. Genet. 1911;1:185–203. [Google Scholar]
  • Bliss S. International Centre for Tourism and Hospitality Research; Poole, UK: 2011. Towards a Theory of Black Food. in: Culinary Arts and Sciences VII; pp. 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Briles W., Goto R., Auffray C., Miller M. A polymorphic system related to but genetically independent of the chicken major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics. 1993;37:408–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cavero D., Schmutz M., Phillip H.C., Preisinger R. Breeding to reduce susceptibility to Escherichia coli in layers. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:2063–2068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chazara O., Fulton J.E., Juul-Madsen H., Chang C.S., Bed'Hom B. Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the International Society for Animal Genetics, July 26-30th; Edinburgh, UK: 2010. High-resolution chicken MHC genotyping using a SNP panel; p. 138. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen J., Weijian W. Medicinal food: the Chinese perspective. J. Med. Foods. 1998;1:117–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Cotter P.F., Taylor R.L., Abplanalp H. Differential resistance to Staphylococcus aureus challenge in major histocompatibility (B) complex congenic lines. Poult. Sci. 1992;71:1873–1878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dorshorst B., Okimoto R., Ashwell C. Genomic regions associated with dermal hyperpigmentation, polydactyly and other morphological traits in the silkie chicken. J. Hered. 2010;101:339–350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dunnington E.A., Larsen A.S., O’Sullivan N.P., Siegal P.B. Growth and egg production traits in chieckens as influenced by major hisotcompatibility types and backgroud genomes. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 1992;109:188–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Ekarius C. Storey Publishing; North Adams, MA: 2007. Storey’s Guide to Illustrated Poultry Breeds; p. 277. [Google Scholar]
  • Faraco C.D., Vaz S.A.S., Pastor M.V.D., Erickson C.A. Hyperpigmentation in the Silkie fowl correlates with abnormal migration of fate-restricted melanoblasts and loss of environmental barrier molecules. Dev. Dyn. 2001;220:212–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fulton J.E., Berres M.E., Kantanen J., Honkatukia M. MHC-B variability within the Finnish landrace chicken conservation program. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:3026–3030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fulton J.E., Lund A.R., McCarron A.M., Pinegar K.N., Korver D.R., Classen H.L., Aggrey S., Utterbach C., Anthony N.B., Berres M.E. MHC variability in heritage breeds of chickens. Poult. Sci. 2016;95:393–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fulton J.E., McCarron A.M., Lund A.R., Pinegar K.N., Wolc A., Chazara O., Bed'Hom B., Berres M., Miller M.M. A high-density SNP panel reveals extensive diversity, frequent recombination and multiple recombination hotspots within the chicken major histocompatibility complex b region between BG2 and CD1A1. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2016;48:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goto R.M., Wang Y.J., Taylor R.L., Wakenell P.S., Hosomichi K., Shiina T., Blackmore C.S., Briles W.E., Miller M.M. BG1 has a major role in MHC-linked resistance to malignant lymphoma in the chicken. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009;106:16740–16745. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haw S.G. Routledge; New York, NY: 2006. Marco Polo's China: A Venetian in the Realm of Khubilai Khan. [Google Scholar]
  • Higginbottom G.M., Vallianatos H., Shankar J., Safipour J., Davey C. Immigrant women's food choices in pregnancy: Perspectives from women of Chinese origin in Canada. Ethn. Health. 2018;23:521–541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hu Y.D., Zhou Y., Liu X.H., Zhu Q. Correlations between microsatellite loci and growth and carcass traits in Chinese Silkies. Res. J. Poultry Sci. 2010;3:5–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutt F.B. McGraw-Hill; New York, BY: 1949. Genetics of the Fowl; p. 590. [Google Scholar]
  • Iglesias G.M., Canet Z.E., Cantaro H., Miguel M.C., Melo J.E., Miller M.M., Berres M.E., Fulton J.E. MHC-B haplotypes in “Campero-Inta” chicken synthetic line. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:5281–5286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Izadi F., Ritland C., Cheng K.M. Genetic diversity of the major histocompatibility complex region in commercial and noncommercial chicken flocks using the LEI0258 microsatellite marker. Poult. Sci. 2011;90:2711–2717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecoin L., Mercier P., Ledouarin N.M. Growth of neural crest cells in-vitro is enhanced by extracts from Silky fowl embryonic-tissues. Pigment Cell Res. 1994;7:210–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li L.T., Yin L.J., Saito M. Function of traditional foods and food culture in China. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 2004;38:213–220. [Google Scholar]
  • Lillehoj H.S., Jenkins M.C., Bacon L.D., Fetterer R.H., Briles W.E. Eimeria acervulina: evaluation of the cellular and antibody responses to the recombinant coccidial antigens in B-congenic chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 1988;67:148–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Macklin K.S., Ewald S.J., Norton R.A. Major histocompatibility complex effect on cellulitis among different chicken lines. Avian Pathol. 2002;4:371–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Macklin K.S., Norton R.A., Ewald S.J. Effect of the major histocompatibility complex on the inhibition of induced cellulitis development in a broiler chicken model. Avian Dis. 2009;53:297–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller M.M., Goto R.M., Taylor R.L., Jr., Zoorob R., Auffray C., Briles R.W., Briles W.E., Bloom S.E. Assignment of Rfp-Y to the chicken major histocompatibility complex/NOR microchromosome and evidence for high-frequency recombination associated with the nucleolar organizer region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996;93:3958–3962. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller M.M., Taylor R.L., Jr. Brief review of the chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex: the genes, their distribution on chromosome 16, and their contribution to disease resistance. Poult. Sci. 2016;95:375–392. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ngeno K., van der Waaij E.H., Megens A.K., Van Arendonk J.A.M., Crooijmans R.P.M. Genetic diversity of different indigenous chicken ecotypes using highly polymorphic MHC-linked and non-MHC microsatellite markers. Genet. Resour. 2015;56:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Nguyen-Phuc H., Fulton J.E., Berres M.E. Genetic variation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in wild red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) Poult. Sci. 2016;95:400–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Norup L.R., Dalgaard T.S., Pederson A.R., Juul-Madsen H.R. Assessment of Newcastle disease-specific T cell proliferation in different inbred MHC chicken lines. Scand. J. Immunol. 2011;74:23–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Owen J.P., Delany M.E., Mullens B.A. MHC haplotype involvement in avian resistance to an ectoparasite. Immunogenetics. 2008;60:621–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reedy M.V., Faraco C.D., Erickson C.A. Specification and migration of melanoblasts at the vagal level and in hyperpigmented Silkie chickens. Dev. Dyn. 1998;213:476–485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sander J.E. The major histocompatibility complex and its role in poultry production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 1993;49:132–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Sato K., Abplanalp H., Napolitano D., Reid J. Effects of heterozygosity of major histocompatibility complex haplotypes on performance of Leghorn hens sharing a common inbred backgroud. Poult. Sci. 1992;71:18–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schou T.W., Labouriau R., Permin A., Christensen J.P., Sorensen P., Cu H.P., Nguyen V.K., Juul-Madsen H.R. MHC haplotype and susceptibility to experimental infections (Salmonella enteritidis, Pasteurella multocida or Ascaridia galli) in a commercial and an indigenous chicken breed. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010;135:52–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Semagn K., Beyene Y., Warburton M.L., Tarekegne A., Mugo S., Meisel B., Sehabiague P., Prasanna B.M. Meta-analyses of QTL for grain yield and anthesis silking interval in 18 maize populations evaluated under water-stressed and well-watered environments. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:313. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shiina T., Briles W.E., Goto R.M., Hosomichi K., Yanagiya K., Shimizu S., Inoko H., Miller M.M. Extended gene map reveals tripartite motif, c-type lectin, and ig superfamily type genes within a subregion of the chicken MHC-B affecting infectious disease. J. Immunol. 2007;178:7162–7172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor R.L. Major histocompatibility (B) complex control of responses against Rous sarcomas. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:638–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

Assessing MHC-B diversity in Silkie chickens (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jerrold Considine

Last Updated:

Views: 6441

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jerrold Considine

Birthday: 1993-11-03

Address: Suite 447 3463 Marybelle Circles, New Marlin, AL 20765

Phone: +5816749283868

Job: Sales Executive

Hobby: Air sports, Sand art, Electronics, LARPing, Baseball, Book restoration, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Jerrold Considine, I am a combative, cheerful, encouraging, happy, enthusiastic, funny, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.